Copyright Law/DNA/Architecture/Human
The genetic composite known as DNA “Deoxyribonucleic acid” of apes which science
found to be relatively close to human’s DNA is yet another convincing evidence
that corroborates my theory that: Time Creates the Universe. (Often refer to as
“Time is God”.) For this analysis, I’ll imply the field of architecture. At the
initial stage of a building project, a design professional must conduct what is
known as “site analysis”. Site analysis is an aspect of schematic process in
understanding the land and other applicable; ranging from weather impact to
contours on the subject site. And, with the result of the analysis, we make
what is known as “programming”. (Programming is to orderly plot the building on
the site, maximizing or minimizing applicable weather impact, whereby each
livable space is spatially programmed and orientated consistently to the result
of the analysis.)
Then; when such house was built; and used for a time period; and
documented for all weather impacts as anticipated by the designer during the
analysis; and found to be satisfactory by the designer as well as the dweller.
(Satisfactory, as such that all aspects of the weather impact were successfully
tolerated by the building envelope ;) Then, at a later date, the same design-professional
was commissioned (by the same client,) to design similar but more efficient
building with added functionalities. At that point, the design professional
could take the floor plan of the existing building (that was designed for the
same client ;) and make a duplicate, and then make upgrades and amendments that
are required for the “new building”; and then add new specification that
explains the new usage. The condition as stated here is considered to be a “new
matter”.
(This condition means that an original version has yielded a successful
result in which a new version was derived.) It is a smart approach to copy from
a precedent (on any subject,) which already yields a successful result. (In
this case, ape adapting to all aspect of ecology.)
The designer, having copied the original floor plan, and similar specification,
(in this analysis; Ape’s DNA) as a pretext for the “new building” (which is new
species “Human”.)
For further narration, I’ll apply the United States copyright laws that
declared such “derivative use” is to be treated as a “new creation”. (This clause
allows some type of musical works attains copyright status as a “new-creation”
with a full copyright protection-even though the new work was derivative from a
previous version.)
This same condition of “shared-practicality” is genetically inherited by
humans, and mostly translated in most inventions. (Examples are all mechanized
instruments such as automobile, and airplane that uses motorized mechanisms, but
yet, each with a completely different function. Most of the mechanized
instruments currently in use are all (somehow) derivative from a precedent.
For these reasons; similarity of human and ape’s DNA is not an evidence
of “evolving from”, because, sheer similarity, is not an indication of sheer
formation; but simply a lineal order. In my opinion, phenomenon of human is far
too great in dynamics to have been “summarized” simply “as to have evolved from
another species”. But the process referred to as “evolution” was Time
implemented process to yield a species with added dynamics. As all matter are
coordinated through the impact and effect of Time; and Time defines all
corporeal substance in the universe. The science has inadequately defines the
origin of universe for lack of broader understanding of the origin of the
universe. Because dictionary defines the word “evolution” as:
“An unfolding process of development or change from its original to its
present state, or that all species developed from earlier forms”. So, let’s
dissects the definition word for word:
1. “AN UNFOLDING”:
For anything to “unfold” it must have attained a condition of “folding”
before it could be “unfolded”; therefore that’s definition error. All stages of
“folding” in any analysis were coordinated by TIME.
2. “PROCESS”
The definition of the word “process” has actually left its tangible behind.
You see, no process occurred without a previous relevant in which the condition
of process is applicable. The process applicable to this translation must have
been coordinated by TIME.
3. DEVELOPMENT OR CHANGE
No development in any action without stage of preparedness, and no
changes occur without a permanent condition. The process leading to permanent
condition was coordinated by TIME
4. ITS ORIGINAL FORM
For anything to reach the condition declared as “original”; such
“originality” stage could not be attained without the laws of TIME.
5. TO ITS PRESENT STATE
For anything to reach a present stage there was an applicable past that
creates an effect leading to its present stage; and such “present stage” could
not be attained without the impact of TIME.
6. THAT ALL SPECIES DEVELOPED FROM EARLIER FORM
For species to “developed from earlier form” such “earlier form” from
which all “species” developed from was mechanized by TIME. TIME creates all
planets, as nothing exists, or ceases to exist without the impact of TIME.
© Copyright,
2012, Moses Abiola, all rights reserved.
