Noah was an African

Noah was an African

Ms. Gina W. [Seattle WA]

If that’s the case; then it is very important to understand that if the true histories of human civilization are to be written accurately; such will inversely elevate various kingdoms in the Western Civilization; and teaching of theories and establishment of religion will be affected greatly. In terms of Noah’s ark:
Unless Biblical Noah was an African descent; the entire biblical flooding may be inversely relevant. The flooding as referenced was after the life of Adayimo and Efasokan. [“Adam” and “Eve”] Which means that the present civilization endures from Noah’s ark; notably because “every living creature” must have “perished” with “that flood”; and only Noah and his close family and some wildlife “survive” and populate the planet as we know it today.

Therefore the Kikuyu; the Maasai, the Baka in Cameroon, the Bura-Asinda in Burkina Faso, the Cambarantama in Burundi, the Urewe in DR-Congo, the Ashantis in Ghana, the Sao in Chad, the Anyi in Cote De Ivories, the Bantu in West Africa of Nigeria; the Asian in Asia, the Indus in India; the Indians in central America and the Celts in Germany leading to the Jute's,and Anglo-Saxon in England are all “descendant” of the survivor of the Noah’s Ark, lest I forgot the ancestors of your pet "Rusty-Wyler"
And if you search thoroughly; there must have been a “chart” to “corroborate” such line of ancestry as indicated.
But arguably, let assume such is “possible” But it is possible only if Noah and his close family on the Ark are African Ancestry; as such is the only scientific viable way civilization as known today could have endure. If not so; the flood as noted could only be regional and not global; or possibly such could have been a dream by a person at one generation that was written down by another generation fascinated with such dream; and eventually it finds its way to the ancient text.

But before you proceed, think of how many non amphibious animal and aerial species to have been located and quarantined for such endeavors.
As relevant as you said; imagine how important African civilization is relevant to human race, if not practically so; then spiritually so; because the bloodline of indigenous Africa ethnography exists with overriding privilege among human ethnography. As realistically relevant; the importance of Africa in all aspect was limited to a few lines; mainly to establish a point of a movement. And the leader of such movement was undermined to have been found on the riverbank instead to reference him legitimately as rebellious son of Pharaoh in search of autonomy. But be mindful; if such was the case; such would have make an African to become a central figure of nation building isn’t it? The power of God that cater for our existence gave us the wisdom and ability to reason in-depth; but are we utilizing such resources?
---- Diary of a living Man ----

Moses Abiola, Social Reformer

© Copyright, 2010, S&G Press